Comments on: Are School Shootings done to help the Gun Control movement?

By: tmaster

tmaster — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:15:12 +0000

The comments do not apear to have any relation to the story. The story was about the killings being planned by gun control nuts to futher the cause of gun control. I now beleive that this may be true in some of the cases. The antigunners will stop at nothing to get the guncontrol they want.

By: Gaby

Gaby — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:09:47 +0000

Thats insane, your article makes no sense, with all my respect to who wrote this article. The gun itself convince you to use it. i’ve been in army, and i have totaly convinced that the gun is the real cause for an easy crime. consider using a knife to kill someone, its tough, need guts, courage, experience, so students are never going to use it, but they may invovle in a fight, rocks, voilent, and at the end they will grew up, and saw how idiot they were.
gun right suck. they should prevent it for the sake to our society.

By: Greg

Greg — Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:02:35 +0000

Here in Texas when we first passed the right to carry laws all the anti-gunners where screaming that there would be mass shoot-outs in the streets. Never happened. Then when Florida passed the Castle doctrine again there would be shoot-outs in the streets. Hasn’t happened. What I have seen, even here in Austin, is police officers killing more poeple thean the citizens that they are to protect. Lets keep the people well armed to protect us from those who are supposed to protect us. Remember the first thing any dictator or tyrant (New Orleans) wants to do is disarm the masses. Also look at the FBI crime stats every state that has a RTC law has seen a drop in violent crime not a rise. Maybe we should go one step farther and require every adult with no criminal record to carry and know how to use a firearm for self defense.

By: Foth

Foth — Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:45:04 +0000

This is the most rediculous article I have ever seen.
Our Rights? In essence they are to blame for these un-necessary and cowardly killings. With such a demand to act as we please, the imposition of authority in the case in Canada would have been adequate in saving two lives for example, does not allow such “infringements” on our “rights”. I will go back to John Stuart Mill’s ‘harm principle’ which states that we should be free to act and never infringe unless we see there is a potential harm to society. This is an adequate view on liberty and our “rights”. A gun, outside of a rifle used for hunting and for police to have an authoritative edge, can do nothing but harm society when left to any idiot on the streets. The United States and the constant struggle for more “rights” will result in a return to the era of primates when survival was a daily struggle.