Comments on: U.N. INSULT TO CONSTITUTION A GOOD REASON TO HALT U.S. FUNDING, SAYS SAF http://www.guncontrolkills.com/90/guncontrol/un-insult-to-constitution-a-good-reason-to-halt-us-funding-says-saf/ Gun Control Kills From LoUiSiAna Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:52:40 +0000 monthly 1 2008-01-01T12:00+00:00 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Michael http://www.guncontrolkills.com/90/guncontrol/un-insult-to-constitution-a-good-reason-to-halt-us-funding-says-saf/#comment-356 Michael Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:50:16 +0000 http://www.guncontrolkills.com/?p=90#comment-356 I own AK-47s,AR-15s,Mini 14s,SKS and will use them as self-defense guns, with hi-cap clips I own AK-47s,AR-15s,Mini 14s,SKS and will use them as self-defense guns, with hi-cap clips

]]> By: tmaster http://www.guncontrolkills.com/90/guncontrol/un-insult-to-constitution-a-good-reason-to-halt-us-funding-says-saf/#comment-314 tmaster Tue, 19 Sep 2006 06:34:35 +0000 http://www.guncontrolkills.com/?p=90#comment-314 Its really strange how you Anti Gun nuts will come in here place your off topic comments in the wrong area and then say we are ignorant. you clearly know nothing about the history of any of the court ruulings or anything about guns. I have posted some more info on the main page for you to more inform yourself about this topic. What the Second Amendment protects is an individual right to bear military weapons, not for hunting, not for target shooting, not for repelling foreign invaders, but for the purpose of preventing oppression of the people by their own government. The historical, textual, structural, doctrinal, prudential, judicial, and legislative evidence is devastating. Its really strange how you Anti Gun nuts will come in here place your off topic comments in the wrong area and then say we are ignorant. you clearly know nothing about the history of any of the court ruulings or anything about guns. I have posted some more info on the main page for you to more inform yourself about this topic.

What the Second Amendment protects is an individual right to bear military weapons, not for hunting, not for target shooting, not for repelling foreign invaders, but for the purpose of preventing oppression of the people by their own government. The historical, textual, structural, doctrinal, prudential, judicial, and legislative evidence is devastating.

]]> By: tmaster http://www.guncontrolkills.com/90/guncontrol/un-insult-to-constitution-a-good-reason-to-halt-us-funding-says-saf/#comment-313 tmaster Tue, 19 Sep 2006 06:22:54 +0000 http://www.guncontrolkills.com/?p=90#comment-313 Typical... The supreme court has made it very clear in past decisions that the 2nd amendment does protect our right to have guns. And is not connected to the militia provision. It is you who is ignorant. Don't believe me look it up. The supreme court has also ruled that the 2nd amendment gives us the right to have military type guns to protect ourselves from the government. >There is no reason for someone to own an AK 47. That gun serves no useful purpose. Your clearly ignorant about what a US style AK47 is. It is not a machine gun it is a hunting rifle that looks like a machine gun. Why should we be prevented from shaping our guns to look like machine guns? >Machine guns, military issue guns serve no purpose and should be banned from legal >purchases. Hunting weapons serve a purpose and are not easily reloaded, and are not >capable of firing at a hundred rounds a second. What are you talking about they have not been legal to build and sell since 1968? Even tho the supreme court in its rulings said the 2nd amendment protects the right to own them. Typical… The supreme court has made it very clear in past decisions that the 2nd amendment does protect our right to have guns. And is not connected to the militia provision. It is you who is ignorant. Don’t believe me look it up. The supreme court has also ruled that the 2nd amendment gives us the right to have military type guns to protect ourselves from the government.

>There is no reason for someone to own an AK 47. That gun serves no useful purpose.

Your clearly ignorant about what a US style AK47 is. It is not a machine gun it is a hunting rifle that looks like a machine gun. Why should we be prevented from shaping our guns to look like machine guns?

>Machine guns, military issue guns serve no purpose and should be banned from legal >purchases. Hunting weapons serve a purpose and are not easily reloaded, and are not >capable of firing at a hundred rounds a second.

What are you talking about they have not been legal to build and sell since 1968? Even tho the supreme court in its rulings said the 2nd amendment protects the right to own them.

]]> By: Just someone who's life has been ruined by Gun Possesion http://www.guncontrolkills.com/90/guncontrol/un-insult-to-constitution-a-good-reason-to-halt-us-funding-says-saf/#comment-312 Just someone who's life has been ruined by Gun Possesion Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:51:05 +0000 http://www.guncontrolkills.com/?p=90#comment-312 Oh my God. You people are the most Biased Close minded people in the world, and some of the most uneducated. The Second amendment does not protect our Personal right to bear arms. That amendment was originally formed so that the States had the right to form thier own Militia, not so that you could own a machine gun. I do not agree to the banning of all guns. The only guns that should be allowed are guns used for hunting. Unless you are a police officer. There is no reason for someone to own an AK 47. That gun serves no useful purpose. Machine guns, military issue guns serve no purpose and should be banned from legal purchases. Hunting weapons serve a purpose and are not easily reloaded, and are not capable of firing at a hundred rounds a second. Police should be issued thier handguns and then leave them at work locked away. Parents should teach thier kids to stay away from anything but Hunting guns and should also lock whatever guns are in the house away from thier kids so that they don't take out Daddy's gun and accidentialy shoot thier friend. Anyway that's my Piece listen or not. Oh my God. You people are the most Biased Close minded people in the world, and some of the most uneducated. The Second amendment does not protect our Personal right to bear arms. That amendment was originally formed so that the States had the right to form thier own Militia, not so that you could own a machine gun.

I do not agree to the banning of all guns. The only guns that should be allowed are guns used for hunting. Unless you are a police officer. There is no reason for someone to own an AK 47. That gun serves no useful purpose. Machine guns, military issue guns serve no purpose and should be banned from legal purchases. Hunting weapons serve a purpose and are not easily reloaded, and are not capable of firing at a hundred rounds a second. Police should be issued thier handguns and then leave them at work locked away. Parents should teach thier kids to stay away from anything but Hunting guns and should also lock whatever guns are in the house away from thier kids so that they don’t take out Daddy’s gun and accidentialy shoot thier friend.

Anyway that’s my Piece listen or not.

]]>