Gun-Free Zone at Fort Hood created by democrats
Beginning in March 1993, under the Clinton administration, the army forbids military personnel from carrying their own personal firearms and mandates that “a credible and specific threat against [Department of the Army] personnel [exist] in that region” before military personnel “may be authorized to carry firearms for personal protection.” Indeed, most military bases have relatively few military police as they are in heavy demand to serve in Iraq and Afghanistan.
In an interview on CNN on Monday night, Mrs. Foster the wife of one of the soldiers shot was asked by anchor John Roberts how she felt about her husband “still scheduled for deployment in January” to Afghanistan. Ms. Foster responded: “At least he’s safe there and he can fire back, right?” — It is hard to believe that we don’t trust soldiers with guns on an army base when we trust these very same men in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The law-abiding, not the criminals, are the ones who obey the ban on guns. Instead of making areas safe for victims, the bans make it safe for the criminal. Hasan not only violated the army’s ban on carrying a gun, he also apparently violated the rules that require soldiers to register privately owned guns at the post.
The anti gun nuts think this shows that we should ban the gun used but the anti gun nuts caused this problem by creating a gun free zone. This was one of the problems with Bush he did not undo all the bad things that Clinton did.
Obama says he will stop this but do you really think ghe will remove the gun free zone or will he try to ban the gun that was used.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/11/10/john-lott-ft-hood-end-gun-free-zone/








Special Forum Templates.