Comments on: Obama picks anti gun radical for Supreme Court. http://www.guncontrolkills.com/412/guncontrol/obama-picks-anti-gun-radical-for-supreme-court/ Gun Control Kills From LoUiSiAna Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:07:29 +0000 monthly 1 2008-01-01T12:00+00:00 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: Gregg Weber http://www.guncontrolkills.com/412/guncontrol/obama-picks-anti-gun-radical-for-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-1888 Gregg Weber Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:22:14 +0000 http://www.guncontrolkills.com/?p=412#comment-1888 Three questions about gun control 1: There are four reasons that someone would be in favor of gun control. What is your reason?Those reasons are: Tyrants want to disarm the people to make them fearful and controllable. Criminals want to disarm the victims to make it safer for themselves from injury and capture. Ignorant want to protect people from accidents not realizing how many are injured or die from accidents as compared to crime, and especially tyranny. The unknown to me reason that you will fully explain. 2: Where is the line separating when you would fight for the Constitution and the people on one side and against an insurrection of the people against the Constitution and on the other side or when you would fight for the Constitution and people on one side and against a tyrannical government acting under color of law on the other side? 3: If you, as a police officer or soldier, were ordered to disarm honest civilians, I am not talking of thugs but people defending themselves their homes and property and their neighbors, would you see it as an illegal order and stand up and refuse to obey it or would you just obey orders? Please give your answers to me at gmweber@q.com especially those in favor of gun control. Three questions about gun control
1: There are four reasons that someone would be in favor of gun control. What is your reason?Those reasons are:
Tyrants want to disarm the people to make them fearful and controllable.
Criminals want to disarm the victims to make it safer for themselves from injury and capture.
Ignorant want to protect people from accidents not realizing how many are injured or die from accidents as compared to crime, and especially tyranny.
The unknown to me reason that you will fully explain.

2: Where is the line separating when you would fight for the Constitution and the people on one side and against an insurrection of the people against the Constitution and on the other side or
when you would fight for the Constitution and people on one side and against a tyrannical government acting under color of law on the other side?

3: If you, as a police officer or soldier, were ordered to disarm honest civilians, I am not talking of thugs but people defending themselves their homes and property and their neighbors, would you see it as an illegal order and stand up and refuse to obey it or would you just obey orders?

Please give your answers to me at gmweber@q.com especially those in favor of gun control.

]]>