GunControlKills.com in LoUiSiAna

May 31, 2009

Obama picks anti gun radical for Supreme Court.

Filed under: Gun Control, Illegal alien President, Unconstitutional — admin @ 3:15 pm

Obama’s pick is Judge Sonia Sotomayor, who is currently on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second District. There she has racked up an anti-Second Amendment record and has displayed contempt for the rule of law under the Constitution.

The Heller decision put the Supreme Court in support of the
Constitutional protection of the individual right to keep and bear arms. Sotomayor, a politically correct lover of centralized government power (as long as she is part of the power elite), immediately went into counter-attack mode against the Heller decision.

Sotomayor was part of a three-judge panel earlier this year which ruled in Maloney v. Cuomo that the Second Amendment does not apply to the states. As she and her cohorts claimed, the Supreme Court has not yet incorporated the states under the Second Amendment. Until then, she believes, the Second only applies to the District of Columbia.

This is pure judicial arrogance — something Sotomayor relishes (as long as she is one of the ruling judges). In fact, protection of the right to keep and bear arms was a major objective for enactment of the Fourteenth Amendment, as recently freed slaves were being disarmed and terrorized in their neighborhoods.

But Sotomayor disdains this important right of individuals, as indicated by an earlier opinion from 2004. In United States v. Sanchez-Villar, she stated that “the right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental right.”

Sotomayor has held very anti-gun views, even as far back as the 1970s. Fox Cable News reported yesterday that in her senior thesis at Princeton University, she wrote that America has a “deadly obsession” with guns and that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual right to
firearms ownership.

Sotomayor’s Second Amendment views go hand in hand with her politically correct views on the law and the role of judges.

In a speech given at Duke University in 2005, she made it abundantly clear that judges are involved in making policy. Realizing that this did not sound very judicial (even though most judges act on this basis), Sotomayor tried to laugh off her brazen admission: “I know this is on tape and I should never say that, [audience laughing], because we don’t
make law — I know. Um, okay. I know, I’m not promoting it, I’m not advocating it.” The audience continued to laugh. They got the joke.

But Sotomayor’s joke will be on us and our liberties if she gets confirmed to the Supreme Court. And that is why we need to start contacting our Senators early and often, urging them to vote against this dangerous nomination.

ACTION: Please contact your two Senators and urge them to oppose the nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme Court. You can go to the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at
http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your Senators a pre-written e-mail message.

One Response to “Obama picks anti gun radical for Supreme Court.”

  1. Gregg Weber says:

    Three questions about gun control
    1: There are four reasons that someone would be in favor of gun control. What is your reason?Those reasons are:
    Tyrants want to disarm the people to make them fearful and controllable.
    Criminals want to disarm the victims to make it safer for themselves from injury and capture.
    Ignorant want to protect people from accidents not realizing how many are injured or die from accidents as compared to crime, and especially tyranny.
    The unknown to me reason that you will fully explain.

    2: Where is the line separating when you would fight for the Constitution and the people on one side and against an insurrection of the people against the Constitution and on the other side or
    when you would fight for the Constitution and people on one side and against a tyrannical government acting under color of law on the other side?

    3: If you, as a police officer or soldier, were ordered to disarm honest civilians, I am not talking of thugs but people defending themselves their homes and property and their neighbors, would you see it as an illegal order and stand up and refuse to obey it or would you just obey orders?

    Please give your answers to me at gmweber@q.com especially those in favor of gun control.

Leave a Reply

Upload your avator at Gravatar.com or you will get a default one.

Get your Gear at U.S. Cavalry Paintball-Online.com Air Soft BB Guns Anti-PC League

54 queries. 0.542 seconds. WordPress abc Special Forum Templates.

This site is a member of WebRing. To browse visit
http://ss.webring.com/navbar?f=l&y=tmaster&u=97132301710039153

 

linking page |

Map